Mail::ClamAV 0.20 patched to build with ClamAV 0.92
Scott Silva
ssilva at sgvwater.com
Fri Dec 21 04:51:26 GMT 2007
on 12/20/2007 12:42 PM Julian Field spake the following:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Denis Beauchemin wrote:
>> Denis Beauchemin a écrit :
>>> Julian Field a écrit :
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> I have produced a patched version of this Perl module which should
>>>> successfully build with ClamAV 0.92 installed.
>>>>
>>>> So to upgrade a test system, download the newest ClamAV+SpamAssassin
>>>> package (including ClamAV 0.92) from
>>>> http://www.mailscanner.info/files/4/install-Clam-0.92-SA-3.2.3.tar.gz
>>>> Unpack and install it as normal. The installation of Mail::ClamAV
>>>> will fail, that is to be expected.
>>>>
>>>> Now download
>>>> http://www.mailscanner.info/files/4/Mail-ClamAV-0.20.JKF.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>> Unpack and install it with
>>>> tar xzf Mail-ClamAV-0.20.JKF.tar.gz
>>>> cd Mail-ClamAV-0.20
>>>> perl Makefile.PL
>>>> make
>>>> make test
>>>> make install
>>>>
>>>> If you're in luck today, that will successfully build, test and
>>>> install.
>>>>
>>>> Now you should be in business, with a new ClamAV and a working
>>>> "clamavmodule" virus scanner.
>>>>
>>>> Please tell me how you get on with this.
>>>> All my mods are in the "JKF" subdirectory of the Mail-ClamAV-0.20
>>>> directory.
>>>>
>>>> Jules
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Julian,
>>>
>>> I noticed your easy Clam+SA install script didn't ask me if I wanted
>>> to install SA and it just did... I don't really mind because that
>>> was on a test system, but is there still a DNS performance problem
>>> with SA 3.2.3?
>>>
>>> I looked at patch
>>> http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5589 but
>>> couldn't figure out if it was still needed. If so, I guess it has to
>>> be applied to the installation dir and then run the install stuff
>>> (perl Makefile.PL; make; make test; make install)?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Denis
>>>
>> OK, I experimented a bit with SA 3.2.3 and patch 5589. Indeed, it has
>> to be applied to the initial directory (patch -p0
>> <sa-async-5-5589.patch) and then perl Makefile.PL, make, make test and
>> make install.
>>
>> I did not dare installing it because I got many errors in the make
>> test run:
>> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> t/spamc_optC.t 9 4 44.44% 2 4 6 8
>> t/spamc_optL.t 16 16 100.00% 1-16
>> t/spamd_protocol_10.t 10 2 20.00% 9-10
>> 34 tests skipped.
>> Failed 3/141 test scripts, 97.87% okay. 22/1974 subtests failed,
>> 98.89% okay.
>> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
> My easy-install ClamAV+SpamAssassin package doesn't do any of the spamc
> or spamd tests as MailScanner doesn't use them anyway. So I don't care
> about errors with those tests, I don't run them in the first place :-)
>
>> I tried "./spamassassin --lint -D < spam.msg" and it seemed to work
>> fine but I will have to investigate some more before going into
>> production. After all, I am almost on Christmas leave...
>>
>> May all of you have a nice Christmas holiday (if it applies).
>> Contrary to last year's Christmas, this one will be a nice white
>> Christmas under loads of snow!
> Merry Christmas to you too!
> Doesn't look like we're getting any snow any time soon :-( All pictures
> of snow are most welcome :-)
>
Can't help with snow here. California, USA.
But rain I have plenty of! ;-P
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list