Very OT: bind/named question
dnsadmin 1bigthink.com
dnsadmin at 1bigthink.com
Thu Dec 13 20:57:13 GMT 2007
Hello All,
I've a caching nameserver configured on my recently built CentOS 5.x
mail server. The server is completely 'self-contained' as all mail
and related processes are local on the box; no gateways.
I recently configured a similar box with CentOS 4.x this past year
and have not seen this problem:
e.g.:
Dec 9 04:07:42 mxt named[3020]: FORMERR resolving
'foxnewsmail.com.spintlink.net/AAAA/IN': 66.45.231.146#53
Dec 9 04:08:39 mxt named[3020]: FORMERR resolving
'www.mailscanner.eu.spintlink.net/AAAA/IN': 64.20.52.34#53
I get many of these an hour. I'm not seeing real named problems,
though. Mail seems to be flowing okay.
What if anything can I/should I do about this?
I've performed some searches on this topic and see that this can be
related to IPV6 being enabled, but I believe I've disabled it. Also
mentions of lame servers being at approximately 60-some-odd-percent
Internet-wide and spammers with forged IPs causing these. That seems
more likely; did the authors of bind just change the error message
for lame servers to be more specific?
Your comments/suggestions appreciated.
Thanks,
Glenn
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.1/1183 - Release Date: 12/13/2007 9:15 AM
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list