Recommended spam.lists and/or sendmail dnsbl settings?

[Scott Silva]

on 12/4/2007 7:00 PM Duncan, Brian M. spake the following:
> Thanks I will look into that, we really like MailScanner (and have
> donated) for the fine program, since we have handled RBL for years with
> MailScanner it would be nice to continue to do it that way.. 
> 
> 
> It just seems odd that there is not more control over RBL checking in
> the Mailscanner product.
> 
> That is why I initially figured I must be missing something and there
> must be a way to control how many RBL's it checks instead of all or
> nothing type logic.
>   
You haven't missed anything, it was just not put in. I think you would 
actually waste more time on the serial lookups of the messages "not" in the 
lists then you would save. DNS lookups don't add that much to the load. 
Spamassassin is the real system hog, and you can already stop spamassassin if 
a message hits the lists first.
-- 
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!