MailTools and MailScanner...
Scott Silva
ssilva at sgvwater.com
Tue Dec 4 22:18:18 GMT 2007
on 12/4/2007 1:58 PM Philip Zeigler spake the following:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> on 12/4/2007 12:06 PM Philip Zeigler spake the following:
>>> ajos1 at onion.demon.co.uk wrote:
>>>> -
>>>>
>>>> The reply back is:
>>>>
>>>> ============================
>>>>
>>>> From: mark at zzzzzzzz to ajos1 at zzzzzzzz Date: Sun, 2
>>>> Dec 2007 22:35:59 +0100 Subject: ajos1 - Re: MailTools and
>>>> MailScanner... CC/Multi-To: (none) Attachments:
>>>> (none) * ajos1 at zzzzzzzz (ajos1 at zzzzzzzz) [071202 21:07]:
>>>>
>>>>> Not sure if you use MailScanner or not...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, never heard of it. Don't know where it is kept (not on CPAN).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Since MailTools 2.01 - We have an error... and we are not sure if it
>>>>> is a MailTools problem or a MailScanner problem... See the message at
>>>>> the end...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The MailTools 2.xx code is a massive clean-up. One of the things which
>>>> changed, is a stricter use of clean coding techniques.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> [root at onion perl_ext]# MailScanner -v | head -20
>>>>> Variable "$FIELD_NAME" is not imported at
>>>>> /usr/lib/MailScanner/MailScanner/Message.pm line 6907.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Understandable. Yes an effect of my cleanups.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> package Mail::Header;
>>>>> $arr->[1] =~ /\A$FIELD_NAME/o;
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Something very bad is happening here: code is added to an existing
>>>> module. This code should either be added in the core Mail::Header
>>>> package OR should be added using the OO extension mechanism.
>>>>
>>>> The author of the mailscanner has to clean-up his code, IMO. I could
>>>> export the $FIELD_NAME, but preferrably not.
>>>>
>>> Just did a yum update on my Centos 5 system and it installed
>>> MailTools-2.02. Is there a fix planned for this any time soon or
>>> should I downgrade to 1.7.7 and exclude the update?
>>>
>>> Philip
>> Which repo did you get this from? I only see it in Fedora.
>>
> It updated today from the rpmforge repo.
>
> Philip
Now I see it. My mirror must have been a little slow.
The only fix so far is to downgrade to 1.7x MailTools.
Who knows if or when Julian might work on this. Just because the MailTools
coder says he is using clean coding techniques doesn't mean it is 100% proper
coding. We will have to see what else breaks.
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list