cut off by spamhaus free use?

[Matt Hayes]

Denis Beauchemin wrote:
> Scott Silva a écrit :
>> on 12/3/2007 11:35 AM Denis Beauchemin spake the following:
>>> Jeff A. Earickson a écrit :
>>>> On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Jeff Mills wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes!
>>>>> One of the things I have done in my servers is move the spamhaus
>>>>> list to
>>>>> the bottom of my list of RBL's.
>>>>> That way, spamhaus is only queried when none of the others match. I
>>>>> find
>>>>> that spamcop gets more than the others.
>>> I did the same and so far it is still working:
>>> cbl.abuseat.org
>>> dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
>>> web.dnsbl.sorbs.net
>>> relays.dnsbl.sorbs.net
>>> rhsbl.dnsbl.sorbs.net
>>> bl.spamcop.net
>>> list.dsbl.org
>>> zen.spamhaus.org
>> I would move cbl right above zen, as they also have a usage limit.
> 
> I didn't see any on their web site...
>>>
>>> So far today, they blocked:
>>>           bl.spamcop.net :  13188 (  5 %)
>>>          cbl.abuseat.org : 131946 ( 57 %)
>>>      dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net :  57306 ( 25 %)
>>>            list.dsbl.org :   1320 (  0 %)
>>>   relays.dnsbl.sorbs.net :     42 (  0 %)
>>>      web.dnsbl.sorbs.net :   1225 (  0 %)
>>>         zen.spamhaus.org :  24122 ( 10 %)
>> What do you run to get this info? Or was it hand compiled? I have been
>> looking for something I could get some good stats with. 
> 
> I run the attached Bash/Perl script.  It parses my maillog looking for
> sendmail rejection messages.
> 
> Denis
> 


Nice script.. too bad it doesn't seem to work with postfix :(

-Matt