install-Clam-SA and clamd

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mark Nienberg wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> on 11/29/2007 4:17 PM Mark Nienberg spake the following:
>>> A buddy of mine is doing a fresh install of MailScanner on a Centos 5
>>> box and he reported to me that when he ran the install-Clam-SA script
>>> and it gave him the option to install Dag's rpms instead he did so. 
>>> But then when he reran the install script and told it that clam was
>>> already installed, it tried to build Mail::ClamAV in addition to all
>>> the SA stuff.
>>>
>>> The build of Mail::ClamAV failed, I assume because he did not install
>>> Dag's clamav-devel rpm.  The script only says to install clamav,
>>> clamav-db, and clamd from Dag.
>>>
>>> I think it would be best to skip the build of Mail::ClamAV if the
>>> user says that clamav is already installed.  Or else tell the user to
>>> install the devel package too.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>> You should have him look at the message with subject;
>> Experimental repository for RHEL 5 / Centos 5
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.virus.mailscanner/58545
>>
> 
> I thought that the experimental yum repository only installed the
> minimum MS package and dependencies.  If so, that doesn't really answer
> the question about installing Clam and SA does it?

I have enabled a lot of extra features and have still only used centos +
rpmforge to install the software. Except for the actual AV software.

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHUQyiBvzDRVjxmYERAkKWAKC2lmvfpe4nIras2rHZz7smQi21tQCgmSSR
6KbyRTlaATE2robgy4//IUY=
=2YWi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----