Simple show of hands... regarding bonded sender, dkim, habeas, etc.

[Gareth]

If they get a negative score in the default spamassassin configuration then
I leave it in.
I have only ever had one spam come through one of these programs (IADB) and
I forwarded the mail to their helpdesk and they agreed it was spam and said
they would take it up with the sender.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info]On Behalf Of am.lists
> Sent: 28 August 2007 03:31
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: Simple show of hands... regarding bonded sender, dkim, habeas,
> etc.
>
>
> I think this, although related to mail scanning practices more so than
> the software, may be a smidge OT, but it's absolutely the correct
> forum for the question...
>
> Does anyone else give "credit" either by way of SA negative scoring,
> whitelist status, or any other reward (pick a style) for senders
> coming in as a "bonded sender" or "habeas accredited" or any other
> pay-to-play sending service?
>
> I currently do not, but I was interviewing someone and their answer
> was "well if they go to the trouble to set that up, then I leave that
> up to the people at bonded sender, etc. to filter out the applicants
> for me."
>
> Personally, I don't care what accreditation a sender has or spoofs, if
> it has spammy intention (URI, phraseology, etc.) I'm gonna filter it.
>
> Does the community agree?
>
> I'd love some other viewpoints on this.
>
> Thanks all,
>
> Angelo
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
>
>