{Spam?} Re: blacklists and archiving

Hugo van der Kooij hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org
Tue Apr 24 20:32:20 IST 2007

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, David Vosburgh wrote:

> Dave Shariff Yadallee - System Administrator a.k.a. The Root of the
> Problem wrote:
>>  This came up in my Spamcheck headers vosburgh at dalsemi.com
>>  spam,
>>          SpamAssassin (not cached, score=5, required 5,
>>          RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS 5.00)
>>  Hoe this helps.
> Thanks for the heads-up.  Never heard of that RBL, but they have my attention 
> now :-).

But they are overrated in this case. What does anyone care how I number my 
network inside? So why attach 5 points just because someone happens to use 
an internal network number on his internal network?

I also do documentation and 192.0.2 does not overlap with any other 
network so far so my VPN's are clean as well.


 	hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org	http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
 	    This message is using 100% recycled electrons.

 	Some men see computers as they are and say "Windows"
 	I use computers with Linux and say "Why Windows?"
 		(Thanks JFK, for the insight.)

More information about the MailScanner mailing list