blacklists and archiving
David Vosburgh
vosburgh at dalsemi.com
Tue Apr 10 16:54:06 IST 2007
I have setup mail archiving to both a file and another email address for
all mail from a particular domain. That much has worked fine for some
time now. I recently got a request to blacklist one address in that
domain, so I put an entry in the spam.blacklists.rules file. The next
time a message came through from that address, rather than being
blacklisted, the message was delivered and archived as normal (and yes I
did restart MailScanner). Is this a matter of precedence? That is,
does archiving take precedence over blacklisting? Or is this a
misconfiguration on my part, or <gasp> a bug?
Here's the MailScanner -v output:
# MailScanner -v
Running on
Linux artesia 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Oct 6 06:21:39 CDT 2006 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
This is CentOS release 4.4 (Final)
This is Perl version 5.008005 (5.8.5)
This is MailScanner version 4.55.10
Module versions are:
1.00 AnyDBM_File
1.14 Archive::Zip
1.03 Carp
1.119 Convert::BinHex
1.00 DirHandle
1.05 Fcntl
2.73 File::Basename
2.08 File::Copy
2.01 FileHandle
1.06 File::Path
0.14 File::Temp
0.90 Filesys::Df
1.35 HTML::Entities
3.54 HTML::Parser
2.37 HTML::TokeParser
1.21 IO
1.10 IO::File
1.123 IO::Pipe
1.71 Mail::Header
3.05 MIME::Base64
5.420 MIME::Decoder
5.420 MIME::Decoder::UU
5.420 MIME::Head
5.420 MIME::Parser
3.03 MIME::QuotedPrint
5.420 MIME::Tools
0.10 Net::CIDR
1.08 POSIX
1.77 Socket
1.4 Sys::Hostname::Long
0.17 Sys::Syslog
1.86 Time::HiRes
1.02 Time::localtime
Optional module versions are:
0.17 Convert::TNEF
1.814 DB_File
1.12 DBD::SQLite
1.50 DBI
1.15 Digest
1.01 Digest::HMAC
2.36 Digest::MD5
2.10 Digest::SHA1
0.44 Inline
0.17 Mail::ClamAV
3.001004 Mail::SpamAssassin
1.999001 Mail::SPF::Query
0.20 Net::CIDR::Lite
1.25 Net::IP
0.57 Net::DNS
0.31 Net::LDAP
1.94 Parse::RecDescent
missing SAVI
2.56 Test::Harness
0.47 Test::Simple
1.95 Text::Balanced
1.35 URI
Dave
--
Dave Vosburgh
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list