SPF_Fail score too low?
Steve Freegard
steve.freegard at fsl.com
Fri Apr 6 18:03:03 IST 2007
Rick Chadderdon wrote:
> Steve Freegard wrote:
>> Rick Chadderdon wrote:
>>> I don't use SPF on all of my domains because some of them have users
>>> that will have issues with it.
>>
>> SPF is still useful here to you here if you supply a PASS result for
>> everything that you know about, then return NEUTRAL for everything else.
>>
>> This doesn't impact the users in any way but can help people who might
>> want to whitelist your domain.
>
> I suppose that's worth consideration, especially if my mailserver's
> address ever ends up in an RBL. But... I really can't see most admins
> being willing (or able) to set up a whitelist that only allows a
> whitelisted domain if it passed SPF. Still, it could be useful in that
> case, I agree.
This is precisely how much of the whitelisting is done in SpamAssassin,
see Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF and have a look at the
whitelist_from_spf directive.
Kind regards,
Steve.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list