SPF_Fail score too low?
res at ausics.net
Thu Apr 5 23:07:56 IST 2007
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Res wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Chris Yuzik wrote:
>> So what scoring would you recommend for each of these?
> If a network admin decides to hardfail, its because he wants networks
> employing SPF to reject mail that fails, who are we to decide to do
> different, we should honour what THEY want done with fake mail.
Bugger, hit enter too soon.
1/ you run a network that has thousands of users, abc.com
2/ I have xyz.com, I choose to hardfail
3/ tj on 184.108.40.206 (not my customer) fakes tj at xyz.com
4/ tj sends successfuly sends 5000 emails into abc.com
5/ my staff get bombarded with thousands of your users forwarding to
abuse at xyz ... all because we said DROP EM but you decide to SCORE EM
6/ I instruct my staff to block abc.com to abuse at xyz.com removing your
ability to complain to us in the case of a genuine issue, you get
frustrated at us for ignoreing you......and you'll wonder why :)
Let Novell know what you think of their back door deal with the devil.
Sign the petition today: http://techp.org/p/1/
More information about the MailScanner