Large emails being tagged as spam - false positives

[Res]

On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Gordon Colyn wrote:

> Here is an example, a legitimate 6.9M email that is classified as spam;

>      2.60 RCVD_IN_DSBL Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org
>      1.95 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
>      0.72 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY NJABL: sender is an open proxy
>      2.05 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
>      2.16 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS SORBS: sender is open SOCKS proxy server
>


WTF legit ? with the above info I'd say thank christ its blocked
because it deserves to be!

--
Cheers
Res

"Just a world that we all must share, it's not enough just to stand and
stare, is it only a dream that there'll be no more turning away" - Floyd