SA lint in MailWatch - 158 seconds?!

[Martin Hepworth]

Billy A. Pumphrey wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info [mailto:mailscanner-
>> bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Brett Charbeneau
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 3:56 PM
>> To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> Subject: SA lint in MailWatch - 158 seconds?!
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>>  	I'm trying to tune my Debian mail server running MailScanner
> 4.55.10
>> -
>> it's a P4 3.2 Ghz with 4GB of RAM. I have mounted MS's incoming
> directory
>> as a
>> tempfs and run a local BIND cache.
>>  	I'm experiencing some slow delivery and am using MailWatch as
> one
>> tool
>> to keep an eye on the process. In the "Tools/Links" portion of
> MailWatch
>> there
>> is a way to run SpamAssassin Lint with some nice timing details.
>>  	I'm getting 166 seconds or more on the
>>
>> dbg: config: score set 1 chosen.
>>
>>  	line
>>  	Does anyone know where I would look to tighten this up? I'm not
> even
>> sure what it refers to...
>>  	Many thanks!
>>
>> --
>> ********************************************************************
>> Brett Charbeneau
>> Network Administrator
>> Williamsburg Regional Library
>> 7770 Croaker Road
>> Williamsburg, VA 23188-7064
>> (757)259-4044          www.wrl.org
>> (757)259-4079 (fax)    brett at wrl.org
>> ********************************************************************
> 
> Still have not seen what command that you are using and is assumed to be
> ok.  Something like:
> spamassassin -D -lint -p /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.conf.prefs on
> the command line

Don't need the -p bit anymore.....

-- 
Martin Hepworth
Senior Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300

**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.	

**********************************************************************