LDAP Rejection

[Richard Frovarp]

I don't know. We use OpenLDAP. Does AD follow LDAP norms or not? If so, 
it should work. LDAP should be LDAP, except certain companies can't be 
trusted to always follow the norms.

Devon Harding wrote:
> Yes, but does this 'LDAP Routing' feature extends to Active Directory?
>
> On 9/21/06, *Richard Frovarp* < Richard.Frovarp at sendit.nodak.edu 
> <mailto:Richard.Frovarp at sendit.nodak.edu>> wrote:
>
>     Glenn Steen wrote:
>     > On 21/09/06, Devon Harding < devonharding at gmail.com
>     <mailto:devonharding at gmail.com>> wrote:
>     >> Using sendmail on FC5
>     >>
>     > Sendmail is not my forte, but as mentioned by Kevin, you could
>     > probably use a milter for recipient verification.
>     >
>     > You should be able to use the access feature and a modified
>     perl/shell
>     > LDAP hack as outlined for Postfix, but... well, no one has ever
>     > bothered documenting anything like that (probably because
>     they're busy
>     > using the mentioned milters:-).
>     > It should acutally be pretty easy... Too bad I've not got (the
>     > inklination to install) any sendmail around to play with...:)
>     >
>     Sendmail has support for LDAP right in it without using a milter. Not
>     familiar with the exact steps, but there is documentation out there if
>     you just google for sendmail and ldap.
>
>     --
>     MailScanner mailing list
>     mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>     <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>     http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
>     Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>     <http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting>
>
>     Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
>
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by EduTech's *MailScanner* 
> <http://www.mailscanner.info/> Vaccine4, and is
> believed to be clean.