Anyone using

Logan Shaw lshaw at
Fri Sep 8 16:31:16 IST 2006

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Res wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Logan Shaw wrote:

>> Yes, he was saying that, before greylisting, 12-15% of the
>> traffic gets marked as clean.  Presumably that is because
>> 12-15% of the traffic IS clean, and the rest is not.  Then
>> after greylisting, 80% of the traffic got marked as clean.
>> Presumably that means 80% of it IS clean.

> Then SA cant be that effective for him.

That doesn't make any sense mathematically.

If I get 100 messages and 20 of them are spam and 80 of them
are ham, and if SpamAssassin catches all 20 spams and nothing
else, how does that qualify as "not that effective"?

   - Logan

More information about the MailScanner mailing list