Increased SPAM getting through

[Glenn Steen]

On 17/10/06, shuttlebox <shuttlebox at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/17/06, Glenn Steen <glenn.steen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > direction;-). Bayes has likely not that much to work with, so... that
> > would probably explain why it fires the _00 rule... And training will
> > not help you much with that type of spam...
>
> That would fire the 50 rule (or not at all). 00 means Bayes is certain
> it's not spam.
I know that Peter. Bad choice of words, perhaps:-).
Rephrase that "the little it has to work with makes it certain it isn't spam".

If they follow the norm and have some stray snippet from a book or
HOWTO or whatever, training on that would probably not lead you
anywhere you'd like to go.

-- 
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se