Panda Wrapper

[Glenn Steen]

On 03/10/06, Cornelius Koelbel <cornelius.koelbel at gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> something seems to be wrong with the panda wrapper.
>
> When testing the wrapper with
> /usr/lib/MailScanner/panda-wrapper      /opt/pavcl/usr /tmp/
> it will not return.
> The call
> /opt/pavcl/usr /tmp/
> opens an interactive text interface.
>
> Using
> ame        : pavcl                        Relocations: (not relocatable)
> Version     : 9.0.0                             Vendor: (none)
>
> and
> Name        : mailscanner                  Relocations: (not relocatable)
> Version     : 4.55.10                           Vendor: Electronics and
> Computer Science, University of Southampton
>
> Kind regards
> Cornelius

Read the wrapper file and you'll find that you are probably "calling
it the wrong way":-). This is what it says:
-------
# To test from the command line change to the directory you wish to
# check and issue this command (change paths to reflect your install)
# "/opt/MailScanner/lib/panda-wrapper /usr -nsb -eng -aex -nso -aut -cmp ."
# Make sure your testing dir is one directory deep (don't for get the . BTW)
# example
# test+
#     .+ testfiles
#     .+ moretestfiles
# execute from directory test and it will scan the testfiles and moretestfiles
# directories. There should be no sub-dirs below those two, this simulates
# MailScanner's process-dir->message-dir structure
-------

With the latest panda out, this wrapper should be rewritten... If only
one had the time...:-)
I don't remember if the options still work as expected... there was
something about that a while back, so check the archives.

-- 
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se