MailScanner users using latest Postfix

Martin Hepworth martinh at solidstatelogic.com
Wed Nov 8 17:22:59 GMT 2006


Jason Williams wrote:
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Glenn
> Steen
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 1:26 AM
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: Re: MailScanner users using latest Postfix
> 
> On 08/11/06, Jason Williams <jwilliams at courtesymortgage.com> wrote:
>>
>>  > Don't think so from the top of my head. There are a few extras that
> 
>> you can play with in your own time (Like milter support in PF) but
> providing you
>> have set your queue depths correctly You   will  > know if you
> haven't, it
>> won't work!) both sides of MailScanner nothing much else has changed
> really.
>>
>> Drew
>> --------
>>
>> Thanks. I appreciate.
>> Well, it is accepting and delivering mail, so that is a good thing.
>>
>> Looks like I need to go through a just comb through the config file 
>> again and set all my settings as needed.
>> I was not planning on this today, so I apologize for sounding and 
>> being very rushed.
>> If I can ask a quick question. Is this correct, for settings in 
>> MailScanner.conf?
>>
>> Should:
>> Incoming Work Dir = /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming
>>
>>
>> Thar right?
>>
>>
>> Jason, from am earlier mail by you, I couldn't help noticing that you
> had set the Incoming Work Dir to the postfiox hold queue directory...
>> This is, simply put, wrong.
>>
>> Set it to something like /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming ... This is
> the directory where the MailScanner children "plays" all by their
> lonesome selves... >There will be a subdirectory/process ID (with the
> PID as name). These subdirectories could potentially confuise the hell
> out of things, if placed in an >>active postfix queue. As it is now,
> when set to the hold queue, the only postfix commands that are affected
> are postqueue -p (mailq for short:-) and >>postsuper, and probably
> rather mildly.
>> Simply stop MailScanner, adjust MailScanner.conf and fire it up again.
>>
>> So the quick answer is "yes":-).
>>
> 
> 
> Thanks for the help. I can't thank you enough.
> 
> Just so I am sure and have everything correct, let me put down what I
> have here (still brewing my morning cup of java so bare with me :) ).
> 
> 
> Incoming Queue Dir = /var/spool/postfix/hold
> Outgoing Queue Dir = /var/spool/postfix/incoming
> Incoming Work Dir = /var/spool/postfix/hold
> Quarantine Dir = /var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine
> 
> 
> Now, I should change Incoming Work Dir to:?
> 
> Incoming Work Dir = /var/spool/postfix/incoming
> 
> 
> Still get those funny messages in maillog:
> 
> Nov  8 10:46:37 gammaflux2 postfix/showq[9478]: warning: incoming/9317:
> uid 125: not a regular file
> Nov  8 10:46:37 gammaflux2 postfix/showq[9478]: warning: incoming/9352:
> uid 125: not a regular file
> Nov  8 10:46:37 gammaflux2 postfix/showq[9478]: warning: incoming/9392:
> uid 125: not a regular file
> Nov  8 10:46:37 gammaflux2 postfix/showq[9478]: warning: incoming/9439:
> uid 125: not a regular file
> Nov  8 10:46:37 gammaflux2 postfix/showq[9478]: warning: incoming/9473:
> uid 125: not a regular file
> 
> 
> Doing a quick look at the directory (incoming)
> 
> gammaflux2# ls -la /var/spool/postfix/incoming/
> total 14
> drwx------   7 postfix  wheel  512 Nov  8 10:47 .
> drwxr-xr-x  16 root     wheel  512 Nov  7 16:10 ..
> drwx------   2 postfix  wheel  512 Nov  8 10:44 9317
> drwx------   2 postfix  wheel  512 Nov  8 10:47 9352
> drwx------   2 postfix  wheel  512 Nov  8 10:44 9392
> drwx------   2 postfix  wheel  512 Nov  8 10:44 9439
> drwx------   2 postfix  wheel  512 Nov  8 10:46 9473
> 
> 
> Are those directories needed?
> 
> 
> Thanks again everyone. Really appreciate your help and patience.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -Jason
> 

Jason

create a new dir for the work stuff - this can be a tmpfs on linux and 
is normally recommended that way



-- 
Martin Hepworth
Senior Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300

**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.	

**********************************************************************



More information about the MailScanner mailing list