MS Config Question - outbound

[Alex Neuman van der Hans]

I know... I have those too. You should try educating them. Educated 
customers are more efficient for you in the long run, since you can make 
more money off of them using less resources. It's almost like the 
difference between house training puppies and herding cats.

sandrews at andrewscompanies.com wrote:
> In my field, we call them customers.  Personally, I think the signature
> blocks are a waste, but the customer sends me money when I do work,
> so.... 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Alex
> Neuman van der Hans
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 4:25 PM
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: Re: MS Config Question - outbound
> 
> You must remember there still are (and will be for a long time) bosses
> like Dilbert's (or the boss in "The Office", UK or US, take your pick)
> that *require* these useless bits of fluff.
> 
> Evan Platt wrote:
>> At 11:56 AM 11/1/2006, you wrote:
>>> I'm currently using mailscanner to scan all inbound mail and that 
>>> works great.
>>>
>>> Is there a way to use mailscanner to also be the outbound mail server
> 
>>> and add a disclaimer/signature block to all outbound messages like it
> 
>>> does for inbound scanned messages?
>>
>> I've gotta ask..
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> I know of no anti-virus program that looks for "This message was 
>> scanned and found to be clean" and then ignores scanning the message.
>>
>> What's the point?
>>
>> I've seen spam with a EXE virus attached ("Microsoft Security Patch! 
>> INSTALL NOW!") with a "This message was found to be virus clean."
>>
>>
>>
> 
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
> 
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> 
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website! 
> 
>