Stocks and P-R-O-F-I-T

[Martin Hepworth]

Max Kipness wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I had recently tried what I thought was a good technique, and created a
> script that fed all email from every MailScanner white listed email
> address into sa-learn as ham nightly, without doing a check on the
> emails. This was obviously a bad choice as jokes and other spam like
> emails must have processed for months.
> 
> Anyway, I scrapped the bayes database and started from scratch using the
> a sample bayes db from FSL (I think it's called). From there I've been
> feeding quite a bit of spam into sa-learn for about a week or two. I'd
> say I've fed about 400 spam mails thus far. However, as of today I'm
> still getting the p-r-o-f-i-t and stock spasm with bayes scores of
> anywhere from 10% to 50%.
> 
> My question is how long or how many emails should it take bayes to
> figure out these spam emails? Is there a way of viewing the progress?
> With the other scores from DCC, Pyzor, Razor, the score is close to
> being tagged as spam, but sometimes it's not quite there because of the
> bayes score.
> 
> Thanks,
> Max
> 
Max

besides the SARE_Stock rules what others have you got. Also the 
SARE-stock got updated a couple of a weeks ago to help with this. Have a 
look at some of fred's and Jennifers rules listed in 
www.rulesemporium.com/other-rules.htm


-- 
Martin Hepworth
Senior Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300

**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.	

**********************************************************************