Another call for improvements

[Matt Hampton]

Julian Field wrote: (merging two responses)
> John Wilcock wrote:
>> Matt Hampton wrote:
>>> A minor tweak to the init script - please can we have the ability to
>>> stop the sendmail process without stopping MailScanner - i.e. the
>>> equivalent to startin/startout
>>
>> And while you're at it, how about the ability to stop MailScanner
>> without stopping the MTA - which can be useful during a MS upgrade.
>
>
> That would be useful, yes.
> 
>
> What's wrong with just stopping all of it then
>   check_MailScanner
>   service MailScanner startout
>?

So the same logic doesn't apply then? ;-)

I was thinking about making changes to my MTA config requires me to stop
mail being processed (and in a split config situation delivered).

matt