MailScanner very memory intensive?

shuttlebox shuttlebox at gmail.com
Sat Mar 4 09:13:53 GMT 2006


On 3/4/06, Remy de Ruysscher <remy at unix-asp.com> wrote:
> 60795 postfix     1   8    0   470M   210M nanslp   0:50  0.00% perl5.8.8
> 68200 postfix     1   8    0   470M   378M nanslp   0:49  0.00% perl5.8.8
> 53602 postfix     1   8    0   470M 55660K nanslp   0:49  0.00% perl5.8.8
> 69900 postfix     1   8    0   470M   389M nanslp   0:48  0.00% perl5.8.8
> 72078 postfix     1   8    0   470M   389M nanslp   0:48  0.00% perl5.8.8

If those are your MS processes something looks very wrong. Depending
on how much rules I use in SA my processes use 25-40 MB of memory per
child. Yours are more than 10 times that!

You're not using the BigEvil rules are you?

--
/peter


More information about the MailScanner mailing list