MailScanner very memory intensive?
shuttlebox
shuttlebox at gmail.com
Sat Mar 4 09:13:53 GMT 2006
On 3/4/06, Remy de Ruysscher <remy at unix-asp.com> wrote:
> 60795 postfix 1 8 0 470M 210M nanslp 0:50 0.00% perl5.8.8
> 68200 postfix 1 8 0 470M 378M nanslp 0:49 0.00% perl5.8.8
> 53602 postfix 1 8 0 470M 55660K nanslp 0:49 0.00% perl5.8.8
> 69900 postfix 1 8 0 470M 389M nanslp 0:48 0.00% perl5.8.8
> 72078 postfix 1 8 0 470M 389M nanslp 0:48 0.00% perl5.8.8
If those are your MS processes something looks very wrong. Depending
on how much rules I use in SA my processes use 25-40 MB of memory per
child. Yours are more than 10 times that!
You're not using the BigEvil rules are you?
--
/peter
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list