Users of RBL's

[Chris Hammond]

I looked at the site and think I will stick with bind for now but keep my
options open.

Thanks
Chris
 
>>> "Glenn Steen" <glenn.steen at gmail.com> 06/26/06 5:54 PM >>> 
On 26/06/06, Chris Hammond <chris at tac.esi.net> wrote:
> >>> Matt Kettler <mkettler at evi- inc.com> 06/26/06 5:12 PM >>>
> >>Chris Hammond wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Understood.  What DNS server in most recommended?
>
> >Well, your choices are bind, djbdns, and microsoft.
>
> >I'm assuming you're using a unix box, so Microsoft is out. I'd also not call DNS
> >Microsoft's strong suit even if you have it arround. (heck, given the state of
> >NDIS 2-  5, I wouldn't call anything network-  oriented their strong suite).
>
> >Since djbdns splits resolving and authoritative servers into two separate tools
> >it might be a bit lighter weight than bind if you're running cache/forward only.
>
> >However, as long as you're not splitting hairs on the edge of system collapse
> >due to overload either should work fine.
>
> Ok, I am going to move to a later version of bind than what comes with CentOS
> 4 which is 9.2.4 and will see if the newer version performs better.  I have read
> alot of people complaining about binds speed.
>
> Thanks
> Chris
>
'If you feel like it, why not look at some of the alternatives here:
http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/servers/unix.html ... Just a tad more
choice:- )
--  
--  Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se
--  
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting

Support MailScanner development -  buy the book off the website! 

--  
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.