Users of RBL's
chris at tac.esi.net
Mon Jun 26 22:19:55 IST 2006
>>> Matt Kettler <mkettler at evi-inc.com> 06/26/06 5:12 PM >>>
>>Chris Hammond wrote:
>> Understood. What DNS server in most recommended?
>Well, your choices are bind, djbdns, and microsoft.
>I'm assuming you're using a unix box, so Microsoft is out. I'd also not call DNS
>Microsoft's strong suit even if you have it arround. (heck, given the state of
>NDIS 2- 5, I wouldn't call anything network- oriented their strong suite).
>Since djbdns splits resolving and authoritative servers into two separate tools
>it might be a bit lighter weight than bind if you're running cache/forward only.
>However, as long as you're not splitting hairs on the edge of system collapse
>due to overload either should work fine.
Ok, I am going to move to a later version of bind than what comes with CentOS
4 which is 9.2.4 and will see if the newer version performs better. I have read
alot of people complaining about binds speed.
More information about the MailScanner