Strange HI Load
Thomas Chamtieh
tchamtieh at nayzak.com
Sat Jun 17 01:00:28 IST 2006
Steve,
Thanks for your insight. It's totally weird, I have 4 other server
running the same version and all identical. These were running fine
before the upgrade. When I say hi LA I'm talking about 70-85% almost
killing the server. On the other 4 servers I have, the LA never goes
above 1.7 and usually is about 0.4-0.7, and these server handle a lot
more mail that the trouble ones.
Thanks,
-Thomas
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After I upgraded from 4.46 to 4.54 I started seeing hi load on 2
> > servers. Looking at the processes. The noticed that after a
> > couple of
> > hours I have 30-40 MailScanner processes in "waiting for
> > messages" mode.
> > I have restart every 30 mins. We process over 200K emails a
> > day. I try
> > as much as I can to take a lod off MailScanner, for example, I use
> > sbl-xbl in sendmail and RBL checking in SpamAssassin, I'm not using
> > RulesDuJour. So it shouldn't be acting that way.
> >
> > Your help is appreciated, I have to check on these 2
> > servers every 2
> > hours and restart the MailScanner to get ride of the hung processes.
>
> As an afterthought, I have an almost identical server. It's
> message count per day is very close to the problem server. I
> have always had bayes expiry files on the problem server, and
> almost never on the proper acting one.
>
> I see where I have about 4 times the number of tokens in the
> Bayes database on the problem machine that I have on the
> proper one. The number of expired tokens on the two machines
> is really extraordinarily difference during an expiry.
>
> I used to run a cron job to delete the Bayes expire files
> just to keep the directory clean, but just turned that off in
> the event I was deleting real, valid files, ... so we'll see.
>
> Steve
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Thomas
> >
>
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list