Who does RBL checks - MailScanner or SpamAssassin?

[Martin Hepworth]

Arthur

Best to do it SA, then it adds to the scores. 

I turn most of them off by giving a zero score in my
spam.assassin.prefs.conf, only keeping a couple RBLs to reduce DNS lookup
time and false positives.

AS Jules says the other network tests (DCC etc) are switchable individually
as these aren't RBLs!

--
Martin Hepworth 
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info [mailto:mailscanner-
> bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Arthur Sherman
> Sent: 07 June 2006 10:13
> To: 'MailScanner discussion'
> Subject: Who does RBL checks - MailScanner or SpamAssassin?
> 
> 
> Suddenly got confused...
> 
> Who should do RBL checks: MailScanner or SpamAssassin?
> 
> spam.assassin.prefs.conf says I am better uncomment skip_rbl_checks and
> let
> MailScanner do it.
> But then I will actually disable Razor and DCC checks, won't i?
> 
> Enabling in both seems unwise and not recommended.
> 
> Please your advice.
> 
> 
> Best,
> 
> --
> Arthur Sherman
> 
> +972-52-4878851
> CPTeam
> 
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
> 
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> 
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!


**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.	

**********************************************************************