Another call for improvements

[Rick Chadderdon]

I think it would be terribly irresponsible to automatically report
programmatically detected spam, no matter what the score is.  I've had
some very high scoring false positives.  Even a tiny chance of getting
someone improperly listed in an RBL without human intervention is too
much to risk for what would probably be very little gain, anyway.  More
harm than good to do this, I think.

Rick

Dave Strydom wrote:
> On 6/1/06, Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com> wrote:
>> isn't that automatically done when auto-learning spam?
>>
>> Kai
>>
>> -- 
>> Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
>> Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
>
> Nope, that updates the bayes db on your machine, what I want is
> MailScanner to take say any message which scores over 25, and use the
> spamassassin spamcop plugin to report the message to www.spamcop.net,
> this will list the server which sent out the mail on a RBL.
>
> Dave