Rise in Viagra spam
ssilva at sgvwater.com
Thu Jul 27 20:05:54 IST 2006
Garry Glendown spake the following on 7/27/2006 1:58 AM:
> over the last couple days we've had a pretty drastic increase in Viagra
> spam ... I have some (older) antidrug-cf and several Rules Du Jour
> configs running, but scores are (though just barely) too low ... here's
> a sample:
> VlljAGRA from 3 , 35 $
> CIjALIlS from 3 , 75 $
> VAjLIlUM from 1 , 25 $
> It has an ASCII and HTML version included, and also sports a piece of
> random text from some literature ... spam scores usually look like this:
> X-nethinks-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (Wertung=4.05,
> benoetigt 5, BAYES_50 0.00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14, HTML_50_60 0.13,
> HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, URIBL_SBL 1.64, URIBL_WS_SURBL 2.14)
> though some have scored BAYES_60 ... (I already ran a couple dozen of
> the spam mails through sa-learn, but that has not increased bayes enough
> Anybody have a suggestion as to another Rules Du Jour set or something?
> Thanks, -gg
I don't think you should be running antidrug with spamassassin 3.0.0 or
better. Most of it was included, and adding that .cf messes with the scoring.
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
More information about the MailScanner