Another call for improvements
ka at pacific.net
Tue Jul 18 16:02:27 IST 2006
Julian Field wrote:
> On 17 Jul 2006, at 18:58, Ken A wrote:
>> Per user S.A. scores would be nice. There are times when whitelisting
>> isn't enough, especially as mail from .CN continues to be both very
>> spammy and increasingly more necessary for business. :-\
> Can you not already do this with a Custom Ruleset on "Required
> SpamAssassin Score"
The required SpamAssassin Score helps, because I can adjust
spam/non-spam threshold per user, but it would be nice to say something
like this in a .rules file:
username SA_RULE -1.5
> --Julian Field
> MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
> --This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
> --MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
More information about the MailScanner