Another call for improvements

[Ken A]

Julian Field wrote:
> 
> On 17 Jul 2006, at 18:58, Ken A wrote:
> 
>> Per user S.A. scores would be nice. There are times when whitelisting 
>> isn't enough, especially as mail from .CN continues to be both very 
>> spammy and increasingly more necessary for business. :-\
> 
> Can you not already do this with a Custom Ruleset on "Required 
> SpamAssassin Score"
> ?

The required SpamAssassin Score helps, because I can adjust 
spam/non-spam threshold per user, but it would be nice to say something 
like this in a .rules file:

username	SA_RULE		-1.5

Thanks,
Ken A


> 
> --Julian Field
> MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
> 
> 
> 
> --This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
> 
> --MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
> 
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> 
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!