question on "Always Looked Up Last" timing
Julian Field
MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tue Jan 24 14:48:36 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Depends on what version you are running. If you have "Always Looked
Up Last" set to anything other than "no" then you should get separate
timing for that. If that happens, then the "Batch Processed in" time
will *not* include "Always Looked Up Last". This will happen with a
recent beta.
Otherwise, it usually does include it.
Try looking at "sub EndBatch" in MessageBatch.pm to see if it
includes stuff about printing timing.
On 24 Jan 2006, at 14:39, Jeff A. Earickson wrote:
> Julian,
>
> Does the "Batch Processed in..." time include the "Always
> Looked up Last" time?
>
> Jeff Earickson
> Colby College
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> MailScanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
- --
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.4 (Build 4042)
iQEVAwUBQ9Y+R/w32o+k+q+hAQFQDgf/chzki866XGkJ+2DDd1wGhcIICxz4Zvyh
bYXbNmKwWrRHbppBUqf2UlsITUafur32cANsYVlc1rpSSwZMtZAmw6OzU7Ah/V1S
fZ2poTEgL0ktIciXqRb6LE8K70wTsFaoJWy+SnkFTug9fKnR5bxN6vlspqVCd/ge
HAj1O547kx83XBUc7jiZ/Y6e0AzcKTBg57zQEOcVyHmFmi5tPAqpsWPzweiYU8Bx
exFS7rwIwn8rp6Vr1ln86mGvETRJz7fHmEgdC958CNoCuyoT20M0qZYH0e08VL5S
IhZYW7iDgpA9ux4sdFw/iRv3QE/awuGQJc4PZVuFHVUel1g54+axOQ==
=qwns
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list