4.50.12 - please test
Jeff A. Earickson
jaearick at colby.edu
Mon Jan 23 15:19:42 GMT 2006
I had a lot of headaches in the 0.86 thru 0.87 era (Solaris 9)
where Clam didn't seem to pick up the latest viruses. By
eliminating Mail-ClamAV, I was trying to cut down on the number
of possible failure points. Things have seemed good with 0.88
again. I'll retry clamavmodule.
Jeff Earickson
Colby College
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Randal, Phil wrote:
> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:08:26 -0000
> From: "Randal, Phil" <prandal at herefordshire.gov.uk>
> Reply-To: MailScanner discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> To: MailScanner discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Subject: RE: 4.50.12 - please test
>
>> Julian,
>> Does auto give preference to the perl modules over the
>> standalone, or vice versa? I use "Virus Scanners =
>> sophossavi clamav"; I've given up on clamavmodule because of
>> problems in the past.
>>
>> Jeff Earickson
>> Colby College
>
> Jeff,
>
> What problems do (or did) you have with clamavmodule? I know there were
> problems in the past with incompatibilities with dev builds of clamav,
> but that's well in the past.
>
> It works without problem here.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil
> ----
> Phil Randal
> Network Engineer
> Herefordshire Council
> Hereford, UK
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> MailScanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list