a.peacock at chime.ucl.ac.uk
Fri Jan 13 11:45:39 GMT 2006
Sylvain Phaneuf wrote:
>> On 13/01/06, Paul Kelly :: Blacknight <paul at blacknight.ie> wrote:
>>> the subject should be prefixed by [MailScanner] ..
>> Looks ugly, makes poor use of the screen resources ( less seen of
>> actual Subject in most MUAs), and will fool systems that rely on
>> Re: etc are inserted (gmail for one) into not threading
>> properly (cf the mailwatch list archives/forums)..... Can we please
>> _not_ have this?
>> It's easy enough making sorting rules on To: ...;)
> Except when someone sends a message and puts the list address in the CC
> field... as someone did a few minutes ago
But you can now use the List-ID header field, which is a much more
reliable filtering item.
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny....'" -- Isaac Asimov
More information about the MailScanner