test -

[Anthony Peacock]

Sylvain Phaneuf wrote:
>> On 13/01/06, Paul Kelly :: Blacknight <paul at blacknight.ie> wrote:
>>> the subject should be prefixed by [MailScanner] ..
>>>
>> Looks ugly, makes poor use of the screen resources ( less seen of
> the
>> actual Subject in most MUAs), and will fool systems that rely on
> where
>> Re: etc are inserted (gmail for one) into not threading 
> conversations
>> properly (cf the mailwatch list archives/forums)..... Can we please
>> _not_ have this?
>> It's easy enough making sorting rules on To: ...;)
> 
> 
> Except when someone sends a message and puts the list address in the CC
> field... as someone did a few minutes ago
> 
> Sylvain
> 

But you can now use the List-ID header field, which is a much more 
reliable filtering item.

-- 
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:    http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new 
discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny....'" -- Isaac Asimov