Hard Lock
Information Services
lbcadmin at GMAIL.COM
Tue Jan 10 22:15:03 GMT 2006
[ The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
Once again one of my mailscanner systems locked up. I had quite a scare
with this one, and I am sure I will be in during the weekend building
another system for when this one kills over. This time I had to take out
the RAM and replug the HDs in order to it to get a sense of itself, but I
am wondering if it has something to do with the powerleaps we have in the
Dell Optiplex G1s. Could they be overheating and causing the lockups?
If this is possible that would explain why it booted after I messed with
the other hardware. But this is what I retried from the
/var/log/messages. Better information, but not something I understand.
Can you make sense of it??
---------------------------
Jan 10 13:05:03 wks-lin9 crond(pam_unix)[11999]: session closed for user root
Jan 10 13:05:15 wks-lin9 crond(pam_unix)[12000]: session closed for user root
Jan 10 13:05:22 wks-lin9 crond(pam_unix)[11473]: session closed for user root
Jan 10 13:06:49 wks-lin9 smbd[12451]: [2006/01/10 13:06:49, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000)
Jan 10 13:06:49 wks-lin9 smbd[12451]: getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
Jan 10 13:06:49 wks-lin9 smbd[12451]: [2006/01/10 13:06:49, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000)
Jan 10 13:06:49 wks-lin9 smbd[12451]: getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected
Jan 10 13:06:49 wks-lin9 smbd[12451]: [2006/01/10 13:06:49, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(430)
Jan 10 13:06:49 wks-lin9 smbd[12451]: write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer
Jan 10 13:06:49 wks-lin9 smbd[12451]: [2006/01/10 13:06:49, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(455)
Jan 10 13:06:49 wks-lin9 smbd[12451]: write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 24: ERRNO = Connection reset by peer
Jan 10 13:06:49 wks-lin9 smbd[12451]: [2006/01/10 13:06:49, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(647)
Jan 10 13:06:49 wks-lin9 smbd[12451]: Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. (Connection reset by peer)
Jan 10 13:06:50 wks-lin9 winbindd[2518]: [2006/01/10 13:06:50, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725)
Jan 10 13:06:50 wks-lin9 winbindd[2518]: tdb(/var/cache/samba/netsamlogon_cache.tdb): rec_free_read bad magic 0x42424242 at offset=7252
-------------------
that is the last information posted to messages before the boot up information is written.
On 1/9/06, Information Services <lbcadmin at gmail.com> wrote:
I am going to check into the HDs. All three systems have the
exact same HDs in them. All the same sw is running on them
also, except for squid on the two mailscanner boxes. I will
also try the suggestions posted in a previous reply to this
also. I definitely need to resolve this issue. I don't want
my production systems to be locking up, especially not at
0200 hours.
On 1/7/06, Glenn Steen <glenn.steen at gmail.com > wrote:
On 06/01/06, Information Services
<lbcadmin at gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
> clamav-0.87
Update cöam asap.
(snip)
>
> First,
>
> When I reboot the systems, it takes about 20
minutes before the login
> screen appears. I am able to shell into the
systems themselves and work on
> them, but I would like to resolve why they
don't bring the login screen up
> right away after the boot process. The GUI
either sets at the blank screen
> with the black curser outlined in white and is
an 'X' symbol, or at the
> progress bar at 100 percent until it finally
shows the login screen.
Assuming you are referring to a graphical logon
screen, this is
usually a display manager for X.... Which in turn
usually means that
extreme slowness is due to a network
misconfiguration. Having no valid
name lookup (in /etc/hosts) for the loopback IF
address usually has
this effect... So check that all names (including
loopback) resolve as
they should. If you have it configured for a X
font sever, check that
it is running, and that you have no network
issues in reaching it.
>
> Issue 2:
>
> I have been havin problems with both servers
locking up. One server more
> than the other.
>
(snip)
Nothing jumps out and grabs ones attention.... So
suspect the usual
things: HW and kernel. One is easy to change....
so why not try your
hand on doing a "custom kernel";-). since both
machines are more or
less of an age, and fairly similar in makeup.....
shoddy drivers come
to mind, as well as diverse age-related cr*p.
--
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot >
com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se
------------------------ MailScanner list
------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki
(http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
the archives (
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
).
Support MailScanner development - buy the book
off the website!
------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/)
and the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list