No subject

At 17:03 19/10/2003, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've got MailScanner set up and working well except that one particular
>email address added to the blacklist seems not to work at all, the email
>address in question is:
>
>owner-nolist-x at WWW-TOPSITES.COM
>
>and a header sequence from an example email is as follows:
>
>Return-Path: <owner-nolist-x*info**STUDIOFIVEARCH*-COM at WWW-TOPSITES.COM>
>Received: from top-site.net ([202.9.152.26])
>      by NS.MY-NETWORK.COM (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9IKapUB011724 for
><info at STUDIOFIVEARCH.COM>; Sat, 18 Oct 2003 15:36:53 -0500
>Message-Id: <200310182036.h9IKapUB011724 at NS.MY-NETWORK.COM>
>Received: from topsitesmail (localhost) by top-site.net (LSMTP for Windows
>NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.0332881E at top-site.net>; Sat, 18 Oct 2003
>16:36:36 -0400
>Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 16:36:36 -0400
>From: John <owner-nolist-x at WWW-TOPSITES.COM>
>Subject: RE: updated translations of studiofivearch.com into 8 languages
>Reply-To: <translate at WWW-TOPSITES.COM>
>To:
>X-my-network-MailScanner-Information: Please contact your network admin
>for more information
>X-my-network-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>X-my-network-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=3.718,
>      required 5, BAYES_44 -0.00, HTML_MESSAGE 0.10,
>      MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER 0.70, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 1.50,
>      RCVD_IN_NJABL 0.10, RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY 0.00, RCVD_IN_RFCI 0.10,
>RCVD_IN_SBL 1.11, RCVD_IN_SORBS 0.10)
>X-my-network-MailScanner-SpamScore: sss
>
>Normally I'd expect to see some indication that the blacklist had caught
>this beast.
>
>Can anyone shed some light on this issue for me, please?
>
>TIA
>
>Ned

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC  7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654