dccfid performance improvement?

[Ugo Bellavance]

Fajar wrote:
> it seems dccifd running fine, the now mailscanner almost instanly
> scanning the message, dunno if this because of the dcc or not. But
> thanks. Sorry for bad subject, wrong subject :D

Hmmm, I think that is the answer you're looking for:

SpamAssassin will use DCCifd if it finds it.  If not, it will use
dccproc.  It won't use both as they do the same job.


-- 
Ugo

-> Please don't send a copy of your reply by e-mail.  I read the list.
-> Please avoid top-posting, long signatures and HTML, and cut the
irrelevant parts in your replies.