MailScanner ANNOUNCE: 4.50 released

[Res]

On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Jeff A. Earickson wrote:

> That's a feature I asked for back in November and Julian has kindly
> implemented.  You get it even if log speed is no.  Useful for tracking
> stats on how fast batches move thru your system.

ok well how about those of us that do NOT want it
those whos logs grow 100 megs a day dont need an extra 10K lines

I'm sure  i'm not alone when I ask the thet log speed = no actually is a 
no logging.




>
> Jeff Earickson
> Colby College
>
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Res wrote:
>
>> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 22:34:21 +1000 (EST)
>> From: Res <res at ausics.net>
>> Reply-To: MailScanner discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>> To: MailScanner discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>> Subject: RE: MailScanner ANNOUNCE: 4.50 released
>> 
>> One thing, its now logging speed...
>> 
>> MailScanner[4790]: Batch processed in 0.65 seconds
>> 
>> I have always had...     Log Speed = no
>> 
>> hiccup?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Nigel kendrick wrote:
>> 
>>> All seems hunky dory on CentOS 4 (RHEL4) - much faster - Thanks again for
>>> all your hard work on this.
>>> 
>>> Nigel Kendrick
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Cheers
>> Res
>> -- 
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> MailScanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>> 
>> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>> 
>> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>

-- 
Cheers
Res