MailScanner ANNOUNCE: 4.50 released
res at ausics.net
Wed Feb 1 13:09:37 GMT 2006
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Jeff A. Earickson wrote:
> That's a feature I asked for back in November and Julian has kindly
> implemented. You get it even if log speed is no. Useful for tracking
> stats on how fast batches move thru your system.
ok well how about those of us that do NOT want it
those whos logs grow 100 megs a day dont need an extra 10K lines
I'm sure i'm not alone when I ask the thet log speed = no actually is a
> Jeff Earickson
> Colby College
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Res wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 22:34:21 +1000 (EST)
>> From: Res <res at ausics.net>
>> Reply-To: MailScanner discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>> To: MailScanner discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>> Subject: RE: MailScanner ANNOUNCE: 4.50 released
>> One thing, its now logging speed...
>> MailScanner: Batch processed in 0.65 seconds
>> I have always had... Log Speed = no
>> On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Nigel kendrick wrote:
>>> All seems hunky dory on CentOS 4 (RHEL4) - much faster - Thanks again for
>>> all your hard work on this.
>>> Nigel Kendrick
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> MailScanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
More information about the MailScanner