Max SpamAssassin Size problems

[Denis Beauchemin]

Julian Field a écrit :
> Yes, you are absolutely correct. Non-spam may well include huge images. 
> The problem with rewinding to the previous boundary is that you may end 
> up not giving SpamAssassin _anything_ to work with.
>
> So it's up for a vote:
>
> do I chop half way through an image?
> do I chop at the end of an image?
> do I carry on for a max of 100 lines of Base64 data or until the end of 
> an image, which is earlier?
>
> I have no intention of making the 100 configurable, it will be 
> impossible for 99.9% of users to know what to set it to.
>   
Julian,

I vote for the status quo (chop half way).

Denis

-- 
   _
  °v°   Denis Beauchemin, analyste
 /(_)\  Université de Sherbrooke, S.T.I.
  ^ ^   T: 819.821.8000x62252 F: 819.821.8045


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3226 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20060824/e67fd83f/smime.bin