MailScanner load
Kevin Miller
Kevin_Miller at ci.juneau.ak.us
Tue Aug 15 20:46:28 IST 2006
Daniel Maher wrote:
> I had three machines running MailScanner, doing around 500,000 mails
> per day across the group. Load was constantly around 20, and mail
> delays were rampant.
>
> Then I subscribed to the TrendMicro RBL, and integrated LDAP for
> destination verification at the MTA layer. The amount of mail that
> actually reaches MailScanner has been reduced by about 92% (not a
> typo, actual tracked statistic).
>
> The moral of the story is this: Adding more hardware is one thing.
> Tweaking MailScanner is another. But actually taking steps to
> eliminate spam at the earliest possible point - that's where you'll
> find real performance improvements.
I agree with Daniel here. Not sure if the OP is running Postfix or
sendmail (too lazy to go back and look) but I saw a tremendous drop in
the number of inbound messages getting past my MTA just turning on
greet_pause in sendmail. Anything that can stop the spam messages
during the handshaking will lighten the load on your servers
considerably...
...Kevin
--
Kevin Miller Registered Linux User No: 307357
CBJ MIS Dept. Network Systems Admin., Mail Admin.
155 South Seward Street ph: (907) 586-0242
Juneau, Alaska 99801 fax: (907 586-4500
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list