Virus Updates noise levels
John Rudd
jrudd at ucsc.edu
Mon Aug 7 00:55:07 IST 2006
On Aug 6, 2006, at 7:12 AM, Mike Kercher wrote:
>>
>> Hi Julian,
>> Any chance we can reduce the noise levels in this?
>>
>> update.virus.scanners: Found clamav installed
>> update.virus.scanners: Running autoupdate for clamav
>> ClamAV-autoupdate[12231]: ClamAV did not need updating
>> update.virus.scanners: Found f-prot installed
>> update.virus.scanners: Running autoupdate for f-prot F-Prot
>> autoupdate[12255]: F-Prot did not need updating.
>>
>>
>> ....perhaps reduce 4 lines into just 1
>>
>> update.virus.scanners: Found clamav installed
>> update.virus.scanners: Running autoupdate for clamav
>> update.virus.scanners: Found f-prot installed
>> update.virus.scanners: Running autoupdate for f-prot
>> - INTO -
>> update.virus.scanners: Found clamav f-prot installed. Running
>> autoupdate
>>
>>
>
> Why?
I think the message subject said it all: to reduce noise level. Signal
to noise level is incredibly important for anything that you plan to
actually read ... like the logs of a production service when you're
trying to track down a problem.
The key to good communication is brevity: say what needs to be said,
say it clearly, and say _nothing_ more.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list