SpamAssassin 3.1.4

Peter Russell pete at enitech.com.au
Thu Aug 3 02:25:15 IST 2006


Julian has his package up with 3.1.4 - should we go ahead and update?



Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> 
>>> I'm guessing it's just a minor bugfix version, but are people out there
>>> using it?
>>>
>>> ...
>>
>> We've tested and found some of the SARE rules are generating errors:
> 
>> VIRUS_WARNING_MYDOOM4'
>> [21887] info: rules: meta test SARE_OBFU_CIALIS has undefined dependency
>> 'SARE_O
>> BFU_CIALIS2'
>> [21887] info: rules: meta test FP_MIXED_PORN3 has undefined dependency
>> 'FP_PENET
>> RATION'
>>
>> But these don't appear to be causing any problems. There are many 
>> comments
>> on the Internet similar to:
>> http://www.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-3.1.4-and-SARE-rules-t2009875.html
>>
>> Any SA list readers out there care to comment?
> 
> We are allready working to get all the rules fixed. We allready put some 
> changes in SVN. Most are harmless, oh and btw, you also listed non SARE 
> rules ;)
> 
> Bye,
> Raymond.


More information about the MailScanner mailing list