Less strict phishing net?

[Rick Chadderdon]

I'm using it, and it's done a great job reducing false positives.  I've
not had a single complaint since I enabled the feature.  My traffic is
quite low by some people's standards (about 30,000 processed mails per
month with about 10 times that rejected at the MTA level) but so far, so
good.

Rick

Julian Field wrote:

> Sorry, brain fart. Should of course been Less "strict", not sure where
> "string" came from...
>
> Julian Field wrote:
>
> >Is anyone out there using my new less-strict phishing net?
> >I would very much like to hear some feedback about it.
>
> >Thanks,
> >Jules.
>
>