bdc replacement

Dhawal Doshy dhawal at netmagicsolutions.com
Tue Apr 11 16:25:16 IST 2006


Randal, Phil wrote:
> Is bdc 7.1 any better?
> 
> # bdc -version
> BDC/Linux-Console v7.1 (build 2559) (i386) (Jul  6 2005 16:28:53)
> 
> (from
> http://www.bitdefender.com/PRODUCT-63-en--BitDefender-Linux-Edition.html
> )

Thanks for the link, i see the same behavior with 7.1 as well.. CPU is 
mostly 60% idle, and bdc consumes about 35-40% of the cpu.

- dhawal

> Cheers,
> 
> Phil
> ----
> Phil Randal
> Network Engineer
> Herefordshire Council
> Hereford, UK  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info 
>> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf 
>> Of Dhawal Doshy
>> Sent: 10 April 2006 21:26
>> To: MailScanner discussion
>> Subject: Re: bdc replacement
> 
>> uvscan v4.4.00/bdc 7.0.1-3.linux-gcc3x.i586/clam 0.88.1



More information about the MailScanner mailing list