OT: Grey-listing?
James Gray
james at grayonline.id.au
Wed May 25 10:14:30 IST 2005
[ The following text is in the "utf-8" character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
On Mon, 23 May 2005 11:51 am, James Gray wrote:
> I've started down the road of grey-listing and have configured but not
> "activated" the sendmail greylist-milter. My questions to the group are
> both technical and political:
>
> 1. those who have used this milter; how effective is it in stemming the
> tide of spam compared to "just" sendmail + mailscanner + SA +
> RBL(OutBlaze, Razor etc)??
For those who are interested, in the first 24 hours of operation our spam is
down by almost 40% and server load down by about the same. Â Those numbers
are
%-age of what was happening prior to implementing milter-greylist.
Pre-greylist:
Average spam: 55% of our total mail volume
Post-greylist
Spam: 32% of our total mail volume.
100 - (32/52)*100 = 39% reduction in spam :):) Or about 20% reduction in
total
mail flow. Â Very nice on a machine that handles around 50,000 messages a
day.
We're very happy and the users, both internal and external, are none the
wiser. Â All is well with the world and we are slowly making ground on the
spammers (until they build smarter spambots then we're back to square 1).
Cheers,
James
--
Bower's Law:
 Talent goes where the action is.
------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list