Loosing mail after upgrading from 4.35 to 4.37.7

[Peter Peters]

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:04:03 +0000, you wrote:

>I did have to change the functionality of the checks for the "Actions"
>keywords in order to provide support for the "add arbitrary headers"
>functionality. This affects how it can work out what you meant in the
>Actions list, and so it can't deduce that you meant a rules file unless
>you end it in .rule or .rules.
>After all, what's the difference between
>Spam Actions = header X-spam.actions.conf
>and
>Spam Actions = X-spam.actions.conf
>It's hard to separate these automatically.
>So you now have to put .rule or .rules on the end of the rules filename
>so it can work out what is going on.

Perhaps you can change the comments in MailScanner.conf to have a text
like "if pointing to a ruleset the filename has to end in .rule or
.rules".

--
Peter Peters, senior netwerkbeheerder
Dienst Informatietechnologie, Bibliotheek en Educatie (ITBE)
Universiteit Twente,  Postbus 217,  7500 AE  Enschede
telefoon: 053 - 489 2301, fax: 053 - 489 2383, http://www.utwente.nl/itbe

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!