RHEL4

John Hinton webmaster at EW3D.COM
Mon Feb 21 18:39:32 GMT 2005


    [ The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

Alex Neuman van der Hans wrote:

>Has anyone compared CentOS vs. RHEL4?
>
>
>
CentOS 3 is a RHEL3 clone. CentOS 4 (a RHEL4 clone) is in rc1 state with
final release due in about 10 days. So, basically, if it runs on RHEL4
it runs on CentOS4. Me, for production machines? I like to wait a bit so
that the "other" packages are updated and allow for the bugs to be found
before jumping onboard with a new distro. I would no more run RHEL4
right now, than CentOS4. I'm content with CentOS 3 for a while longer,
although I'm drooling over the finally included MySQL 4.1 in the 4
distro. But, again, for production servers... I've been burned before...
so I'll sit where I am for a bit longer. For a testbed.. sure.. grab 4
and see what issues you have.

Best,
John Hinton

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!




More information about the MailScanner mailing list