postfix delay

[David Curtis]

Thanks to every one for their input. I will start looking into these
suggestions.

Is there really any benefit to using sendmail over postfix? It seams
like there might be but I have never used sendmail.

Thanks.

>>> Glenn.Steen at AP1.SE 2/17/2005 7:39:56 AM >>>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MailScanner mailing list
> [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Drew Marshall
> Sent: den 17 februari 2005 13:08
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: postfix delay
>
>
> On Thu, February 17, 2005 11:39, Steen, Glenn said:
> > Thanks Drew. Thought so, but it's always better to have
> more than one
> > pair of eyes....:)
> >
> > I found a lot of the anti-UCE docs on
> http://www.postfix.org/docs.html
> > to be very helpful,
> especially John Seymours
> > http://jimsun.linxnet.com/misc/postfix-anti-UCE.txt
> > ... And some nice rtfm on the smtpd_*_restrictions settings:-).
>
> Yes, there is lots of good info out there. I spent ages
> re-formatting my
> main.cf so I could easily identify, set up and maintain
> particularly the
> smtpd_* options using nice stacked options starting with white
spaces.
> That way I know what will be checked and in which order. I
> have also been
> using an extension to the 'single Postfix instance' MailScanner
rule,
> allowing me to block using other headers. Put all other lines
> *above* the
Yep. I use that same space for "Header sanitizing" too... Have a
longish
list of headers that I simply IGNORE (more than the usual stuff you
find
on security-sage etc). Works very well. Can share upon request
(perhaps
off list).

> Received: check for MailScanner but you can use regex to
> block based on
> Subject: (Crossing threads slightly :-) ) From: or anything else you
> fancy. It's been very effective rejecting mail from a broken
> mailer at my
> car insurance company (2000 copies of the same confirmaton in
> 2 hours).
:-) May be a good indicator to use another insurance firm...:-)

Regards
-- Glenn
>
> Drew
>
>
> --
> In line with our policy, this message has
> been scanned for viruses and dangerous
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> www.themarshalls.co.uk/policy
>
> ------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
> To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
> 'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
> Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
> the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!







This email may contain information protected under the Family
Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) or the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).  If this email contains
confidential and/or privileged health or student information and you
are not entitled to access such information under FERPA or HIPAA,
federal regulations require that you destroy this email without
reviewing it and you may not forward it to anyone.

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!