Bit Defender

[Pete Russell]

    [ The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

How did you get those stats out of mailscanner?



Dhawal Doshy wrote:
> Pete Russell wrote:
>
>> Of course i am usijng clamav already.
>>
>> My question was is it worth the effort to have both? Does BD ever catch
>> a virus not caught by clamav?
>>
>> Pete
>
>
> twice in ~3000 mails.. I am ASSUMING that this was due to the fact the
> clam was probably being updated at that time (thereby creating a lock
> asking MS not to use it).
>
> Also in the same result, thrice did uvscan detect a virus when both clam
> / bdc failed to detect it.
>
> Again in the same result, 10 times clam detected a virus when both
> uvscan / bdc failed to detect it (all attributed to phishing detection).
> So this contradicts my previous statement that clam detects more viruses
> compared to uvscan.
>
> Some statistics for viruses detected over a period of 12 hours that you
> might find interesting.
>
> Bitdefender: 2992
> ClamAV: 3075
> McAfee: 3065
>
> - dhawal
>
> ------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
> To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
> 'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
> Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
> the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
>
>

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!