Bayes and spam increase?
Magda Hewryk
MHewryk at SYMCOR.COM
Mon Feb 7 18:22:41 GMT 2005
Yes, I've got a lot untagged spam email on the weekend. I found BAYES_00
-2.60 attached to all of them.
Thanks,
Magda
Matt Kettler
<mkettler at EVI-INC
.COM> To
Sent by: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
MailScanner cc
mailing list
<MAILSCANNER at JISC Subject
MAIL.AC.UK> Re: Bayes and spam increase?
02/07/2005 11:23
AM
Please respond to
MailScanner
mailing list
<MAILSCANNER at JISC
MAIL.AC.UK>
At 10:43 AM 2/7/2005, Fractal IT Dept. wrote:
>Hi everyone!
>
>We've noticed an increase in the number of spam sneaking through with
>scores "just under" our threshold. After looking through the headers for
>these messages, I've noticed that bayes seems to have "no opinion" on the
>majority of these (ie. no bayes entry). Am I missing something? I thought
>bayes would score every message?
That's not entirely true, especially for the 2.6 series.. in 2.6x or 2.5x,
In those any "no matches" or other 50/50 chance does not get a BAYES_ rule
match.
Can you tell us what version of SpamAssassin you are using?
------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list