Any potential gotchas using Maildir with MailScanner?
Scott Silva
ssilva at SGVWATER.COM
Wed Dec 28 16:52:25 GMT 2005
[ The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
Kai Schaetzl spake the following on 12/28/2005 8:41 AM:
> Jeff A. Earickson wrote on Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:46:08 -0500:
>
>
>>This isn't a MailScanner issue, but you are probably aware that
>>maildir gobbles up zillions of inodes on your mailbox filesystem,
>>and you need to plan for this...
>
>
> And how? Smaller block-size on separate partition for the mail
> spool/storage? Do I need one inode per message?
>
> Kai
>
A simple solution would be to use ReiserFS on that partition, as it
stores its metadata in a b-tree index, and doesn't suffer with the inode
limit problem. It is supposed to be much faster with the smaller file
sizes also.
--
/-----------------------\ |~~\_____/~~\__ |
| MailScanner; The best |___________ \N1____====== )-+
| protection on the net!| ~~~|/~~ |
\-----------------------/ ()
------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list