Any potential gotchas using Maildir with MailScanner?

Scott Silva ssilva at SGVWATER.COM
Wed Dec 28 16:52:25 GMT 2005


    [ The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

Kai Schaetzl spake the following on 12/28/2005 8:41 AM:
> Jeff A. Earickson wrote on         Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:46:08 -0500:
> 
> 
>>This isn't a MailScanner issue, but you are probably aware that 
>>maildir gobbles up zillions of inodes on your mailbox filesystem, 
>>and you need to plan for this...
> 
> 
> And how? Smaller block-size on separate partition for the mail 
> spool/storage? Do I need one inode per message?
> 
> Kai
> 
A simple solution would be to use ReiserFS on that partition, as it
stores its metadata in a b-tree index, and doesn't suffer with the inode
limit problem. It is supposed to be much faster with the smaller file
sizes also.



-- 

/-----------------------\           |~~\_____/~~\__  |
| MailScanner; The best |___________ \N1____====== )-+
| protection on the net!|                   ~~~|/~~  |
\-----------------------/                      ()

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!



More information about the MailScanner mailing list