Why is MS doing spam checks first?

Kai Schaetzl maillists at CONACTIVE.COM
Thu Dec 1 21:31:18 GMT 2005


    [ The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

Remco Barendse wrote on         Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:28:51 +0100:

> I would assume the zipfiles contain a virus / trojan, but why isn't MS 
> doing virus and filename checks first? It would save a lot of cpu cycles 
> on spamass which is putting more and more mail servers to a grinding halt

You can reject almost 100% of all viruses without even Mailscanner working. 
Just reject on MTA level based on zombie and DUHL RBL lists and/or use 
greylisting. The only viruses you will get are those bounced by real 
mailservers.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the Wiki (http://wiki.mailscanner.info/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!



More information about the MailScanner mailing list